Google visualization a contrast in styles

I really like the Google finance visualization. On the other hand Google analytics could be greatly improved. Coda Hale did a great analysis and offers some suggestions. Google has a talented team of people who did the Finance visualization, I agree with Coda Hale, have them do Google analytics.

When I first saw Google Finance I thought that they hired Edward Tufte. Who ever did finance should be doing all data visualization for Google.

links for 2006-08-24

Redirects

I was reading Dave Winer’s Scripting News when I came to the post linking to an explanation of redirects. It was fitting that I read the article as I prepare to migrate to FeedBurner feeds. It reminded me of a bit of time I spent figuring out HTTP. I have to say reading the HTTP spec is a bit dry but it really helped me better understand the web. The HTTP spec and Roy Fielding’s Dissertation on REST have been quite helpful over the last 5 years.

Links:
Scripting News RSS feed

Http 1.1 Spec
Http 1.1 spec return codes

Leading with a progressive message

A leader must always communicate a progressive message. It must provide a clear path of advancement on the goal and mission. A progressive message must be:

  • Honest
  • Accurate
  • Actionable
  • Focused

Communicating a progressive message does not mean one must ignore problems or failures, a progressive message recognises the problems and failures. In recognizing problems and failures the leader uses the adversity as a way-point to the goal and a successful mission. Failing to maintain a progressive message will undermine the moral and productivity of the team. If the person leading can’t point to the progressive path the team will stall.

So maintain a progressive message and bring your people forward.

To Delete (private) or Not To Delete (not private)..

That is the question, is it private or not private, or is it even your data. This all, in an interesting article about search history and how it should be handled (via WSJ).
John Battelle thinks the search engines should take a stronger position.
The Attention Trust lays out the principles that customers should require of their consumers of their attention.
The government is trying to protect your data and at the same time trying to ensure that they have access to it.

The way I see it, its our data without the user Google wouldn’t exist and the government is sanctioned by the people for the people. We need to be more demanding of our online relationships when it comes to the privacy and handling of our data. We also need to be more exacting and demanding of our elected officials in protecting our basic rights. It’s not that the government shouldn’t have access to our Internet activity, that access should follow due process, be visible to the user or their legal representative (in some cases this may be a court) and be transparent. Companies should respect the user’s rights and provide clear mechanisms for customers to exercise those rights. We minimally share copyright on our user data. Companies need to recognize that joint copyright and set forth a framework for collaboration and rights management (which may include explicit termination of rights).

Just my two cents.

oh yeah

Questions in my mind,

What is the value of the history of human behavior (online or offline)? Don’t know, but that information serves us to this day, will Google query history, who knows.

When do the names on a war memorial become obsolete? Never.
What about privacy, can someone refuse to have a family members name on a memorial? Not sure.

Is it just me

In San Diego I never see Banks showing the time and the temperature. It may just be a Midwest thing, something for us to complain about, no time or the weather. Or in San Diego, The temperature is perfect and who cares what time it is, it’s just now.